For Emergency Clinicians
The care was delivered. Make sure the note says so.
One last look before you sign. ChartPilot reads your note, asks a few questions about the work you already did, and writes the MDM up in your words.
About thirty seconds a note · three to five questions · written in your words
Sign in
AlphaWith the account issued to you.
Alpha — de-identified or synthetic notes only. Please don't paste real patient identifiers.
Safety checkTroponin result
Which troponin result is correct — the negative one in Diagnostics, or the positive one the MDM builds its NSTEMI on?
The two sections disagree, and the diagnosis rests on the second.
Documentation creditEKG interpretation
0.17 wRVUDid you interpret the EKG yourself?
Your note says an EKG was obtained, but not what you read on it.
Documentation now supports
99284with 93010
- Before review
- 2.74 wRVU
- Captured
- +0.17 wRVU
- After review
- 2.91 wRVU
What it looks for
Three kinds of finding, in the order that matters.
Documentation is written at the end of a shift, for a reader who isn't there. You reassessed the patient four times and watched a borderline vital sign for an hour; the chart went out describing a fraction of it. Safety questions come first. Credit comes last.
Contradictions in the chart
A troponin recorded negative and described as positive. The left knee documented, the right knee splinted. A word dictation dropped. Asked as a question, not asserted as an error.
Reasoning that isn't on the page
The risk stratification behind a discharge. The specificity that makes a diagnosis codable. Not because the care was wrong — because the note doesn't yet show why it was right.
Work already performed
Critical care time. An independent EKG interpretation. A procedure whose details determine its code. ChartPilot asks only about work your note shows was done — not about billing for something that wasn't.
How it works
Three steps, one screen, about thirty seconds.
- 1
Paste your note
Your MDM, or the whole chart if that's easier. More context means a more thorough review.
- 2
Answer a few questions
Three to five, about work you already did. Skip anything that doesn't apply — skipped items stay out.
- 3
Copy it back
A structured MDM built only from your note and your confirmed answers, formatted for the person who codes it.
The commitment
If it happened, document it. If it didn’t, don’t. If it’s unclear, ask.
Every sentence ChartPilot writes is meant to trace back to your original note or to an answer you gave it — and an automated check holds any draft that adds a fact, a qualifier or a study it can't find in either. Say no to a question and it stays out. Short note in, short note out — not a paragraph of plausible-sounding boilerplate.
Grounded in your words
Designed so that no clinical fact, diagnosis or qualifier is added unless it's in your note or you confirmed it — and a draft that breaks that rule is held before you can copy it.
You confirm, then it writes
ChartPilot asks rather than assumes. Declined items are kept out of the draft, and the draft is checked against them before it reaches you.
The level isn't inflated
The E/M level moves only on a fact you confirm, the reasoning layer is told to explain a cap rather than talk you into a number, and time or a service below its threshold is not credited — that part is arithmetic, not judgement.
Two engines, not one model
A deterministic rules engine for the checks that must fire the same way every time — critical care thresholds, EKG interpretation, sedation time, post-procedure checks — and a clinical reasoning layer graded against the 2023 AMA MDM guidelines. Each is told what the other has settled, so neither re-asks it.
For groups and health systems
Built to sit inside a clinician's workflow, not beside it.
ChartPilot is in alpha with emergency clinicians today. The roadmap from here is group-level documentation analytics, per-clinician trends, SSO and role-based access, and EHR integration — the layer that turns individual chart review into a measurable program.